What drives successful leaders
What
drives successful leaders
When
you look at the most successful people in franchising
– and we’re making an assumption that the most
successful people are often CEOs of large, successful
companies – there are certain common characteristics
that begin to paint a portrait.
And that portrait is handy to have whether you’re
looking at succession planning for your company, or
you’re starting out in business and want to learn the
behaviors to emulate.
Here’s that portrait, based on answers to the Birkman
Method test, a comprehensive list of questions that
looks at both your behaviors and values and what you
consider the behaviors and values “most people”
share.
By Peter Capodice
What
natural behavioral competencies do the franchise
industries most successful leaders possess and
exhibit? What drives them? How does their behavior
alter under stress? How do they view
society/relationships? What are they passionate
about?
What better way to find out than to utilize a method
that crosses domestic and international boundaries?
The Birkman Method has been used for 50 years and
gives a graphic four-dimensional portrait of the
organization; individuals and team members, their
interests and goals, operating styles, underlying
needs and behavior under stress- all factors that
govern personal and organizational productivity. It
is used by the United Nations, Wal-mart, Exxon
Chemical, John Hopkins Hospital, Stanford University,
Sony Pictures, Yorkshire Restaurant Group and
thousands of for-profit and not-for-profit
organizations around the world.
Approximately 30 of the 50 selected leaders with
proven track records were kind enough to participate
in this groundbreaking study. Some of the
participants include: Jim Amos, Mail Boxes Etc, IFA
Chairman; Fred DeLuca, Subway: Sid Feltenstein,
Yorkshire Restaurant Group; Peter Gaughn, BCT; Steve
Lowrey, Franchise Concepts; Chris Sullivan, Outback
Steakhouse; Lloyd Swiggum, Steamatic; Robert &
Jeff Yarmuth, Sonny’s BBQ.
As general statements about this successful
leadership group, we can make the following general
statements:
♣
They are
passionate about directing and motivating people and
like to build agreement between people and persuade,
counsel or teach.
♣
They are
direct but friendly, energetic and objective,
methodical, consistent and concentrative.
♣ They are
most comfortable when people around them are:
democratic rather than assertive, tell the rules and
encourage trust and fairness, objective and rational
in their approach, given clear cut decisions to make,
friendly but direct when they talk to them.
♣
Under
stress they might become resistive to change, over
controlling and rigid, abrupt and impatient,
protective and routine minded, busy for sake of it.
Relating to people one on one:
(This
is true 100 percent of participants’ observable
behavior and is extremely important when dealing with
performance management)
♣ Candid
and matter-of fact.
♣
They give
priority to work.
♣
Outspoken
& unevasive.
♣
Direct
& straightforward.
Relating
to people in groups:
(This
is true of greater than 96 percent of observable
behavior and may be observed at times by the
remaining 4 percent. No participant scored low in
this area.)
♣ Socially
comfortable around most people
♣
Communicative
in groups
♣
Enjoy
group debate, but wants to win
♣
Enthusiastic
about working with a team
Team
Orientation versus individual orientation:
(This
would be true of 100 percent of the groups’
observable behavior)
♣ Trustful
& team spirited
♣
Emphasizes
intangible values
♣
Aware of
long-term benefits
♣
Cooperative
& well-intentioned.
Preferred
pace of action:
(High
scores reflect results-driven behavior. 100 percent
of the group scored very high in this area.)
♣ Direct,
forceful, enthusiastic
♣
Vigorous
and persuasive
♣
Works to
capacity
♣
Acts and
responds immediately
Objectivity
vs. subjectivity:
(This
would be true of 100 percent of the group)
♣ Emphasizes
action over thought
♣
Objective
and detached
♣
Competitive
♣
Focuses
on practical results
♣
Focuses
on solutions.
Personal
independence:
(100
percent of the group scored moderate to high in this
area)
♣ Individualistic
♣
Responsive
♣
Self-directed
♣
Initiates
own course
Action
vs. reflection:
(100
percent of the group scored low to moderate, meaning
that this group prefers action to reflection)
♣ Decisive
in thought & action
♣
Grasps
situations quickly
♣
Direct
and to the point
♣
Quick in
forming judgments
♣
Makes
immediate decisions
Management
Style:
♣ Utilizes
plans and strategies. Arranges resources and assists
subordinates and teams in dealing with resource and
implementation issues.
Delegative
Management Style:
Social
Adaptability – Preference for:
♣ Positive
relationships
♣
Mutual
trust in dealing with others
♣
Situations
that allow tolerance
♣
Lessening
the discomfort in personality clashes and working
well with others.
Social Responsibility – Preference for:
♣ Socially
conventional work and people
interactions.
♣
Staying
with established traditions and social
expectations
♣
Looking
for acceptance from a socially conventional
group.
Self
Development – Preference for:
♣ Traditional
educational approach to growth and
development
♣
Contributions
that are of a professional or managerial
nature.
Corporate
Adaptability – Preference for:
♣ Positions
of major responsibility that demand commitment or
sacrifice.
♣
Exerting
strong authority and leadership.
♣
Involving
others in making sacrifices for the company or team.
Sales
– Preference for:
♣ Opportunities
for persuasive communication.
♣
Convincing
others to accept ideas, proposals, services, or
products.
♣
More
interaction with people than procedures.
Consultative Sales – Preference for:
♣ Utilizing
substantial product knowledge to sell persuasively.
♣
Using
interactive techniques to sell or persuade.
Persuasive
– Persuasive interactions with others.
♣ Motivating
others to accept ideas, actions or opinions through
means of persuasion, reasoning or
argument.
Competition
and direct sales – Preference for:
♣ Work
involving persuading and
influencing
♣
Positions
that stress communication
♣
Troubleshooting
interactions
♣
Debating,
convincing, instructing or selling.
Social
Services – Preference for:
♣ Organized
assistance and services to support and advance social
conditions of the individual and community.
♣
Services
that involve helping people.
♣
Work that
supports the emotional needs of others.
♣
Teaching
or counseling.
♣
Understanding
the thoughts and feelings of others.
Literary
– Preference for:
♣ Creative
interest in writing and in sophisticated language
skills. Indicates appreciation for abstract ideas
conveyed in various mediums and materials.
♣
Creative
expression of abstract ideas, written or verbal.
♣
Formal
persuasion
♣
Diplomatic
service.
There is
a clear pattern in outward observable behavior. There
is no clear pattern in what motivates each of these
individuals because these underlying needs are mostly
hidden and only uncovered through an assessment such
as this. Without this understanding you will not in
most cases understand why the stress behavior has
occurred.
It is also imperative that when looking at future
leaders for any organization, the
competencies/behaviors are tied to organizational
strategies looking forward, not the past.